Repository navigation
Conversation
The 2026-09-24 checkpoint still said the 1 MiB receipt/scan budgets were failed and that loopx-project#4931 was only an optimization without proof. The formal matched-1m re-measure has since run at head a948507 (containing the merged read-proof reuse), on a measurement entrypoint repaired by loopx-project#8256: receipt p95 26.44/27.65 ms and scan-100 p95 60.85/69.62 ms at 10k/100k, both inside the 50/250 ms budgets with no depth degradation, ledger 13 passed / 0 failed / 11 missing. Record that closure as a dated checkpoint in both languages, with the boundary stated equally clearly: the soak failed at 9d22.85h and the recovery, consumer-lag and OS/runtime matrices remain missing, so this closes budget rows, not D2. Refs loopx-project#4224 Signed-off-by: Lihua <1017343802@qq.com>
loopx-agent
left a comment
loopx-agent
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer: model_agent | gpt-6.1-sol | OpenAI | runtime_reported | reasoning_effort=max
动机 / Motivation
维护 SQLite 资格记录的人，需要知道哪些历史预算已经重新测量，哪些长期验收仍然缺证据。原检查点只保留九月的 1 MiB receipt/scan 失败；新增带日期的段落对照后来公开的正式复测，同时保留原失败、失败 soak 及 D2 未完成边界。两份语言镜像准确转录公开记录中的四个 p95、50/250 ms 阈值、13/0/11 账本及未完成项，未修改阈值或宣布 D2 通过。本 PR 只维护文档，不重新运行容量或自然时间实验，不修改存储、默认 provider、预算、测试和晋升权限。
改动思路 / Approach
保留旧检查点，再追加一条有日期、有来源、有限范围的复测说明，比覆盖旧失败更便于后续资格判断。这里的有效结果是文档与已公开记录一致，不是本评审重新签发性能或 D2 证书。没有新增配置或用户操作，也没有让后续独立改进等待整个 D2 矩阵。
具体改动 / Changes
关键内容讲解
准确 head 64c4798745e96c3efad812b453d46dfc7cb65f85，两份既有 RFC 镜像共 +20/-0。英文第 3440 行附近和中文第 2671 行附近追加同一段：10k/100k 的 receipt p95 为 26.44/27.65 ms，scan-100 为 60.85/69.62 ms；对应预算 50/250 ms、账本 13 passed / 0 failed / 11 missing。两种语言均保留失败 soak 9d22.85h、恢复、consumer-lag 与 OS/runtime 缺口，明确这些行通过不等于 D2。
逐项核对的是作者的正式复测记录和失败 soak 记录。公开记录声明 Node 22.22.3 / SQLite 3.51.3、macOS arm64、WAL/FULL；数值、历史对照与剩余缺口均相符。
规范依据：docs/architecture/rfcs/shared-goal-authority-state-provider-v0.md，固定修订 94366314f0ba281b97b6ff2fc90b929320b163af，7.2 implemented 仅指保持预算、原失败、工作负载轴及资格分层的文档约束。真实自然时间及完整 D2 资格仍未由这个 PR 交付。
来源边界也单独核对了：a9485073f 对应 a9485073f219a416689f62824c5117269289e596；#8256 于 2026-11-08 05:12:15Z 合并，其 merge 不是该旧源码的祖先。因此应区分记录中的存储测量基线和另行修复的 measurement runner，不能理解为这个旧 commit 自身已经包含后来合并的 runner 修复。本审未拿两套源码或旧报告拼接成一次新的正式测量。
对主干的风险 / Risks
未发现阻断问题。 主要风险是把局部预算关闭误读成 provider 晋升、十天资格或全平台通过；新增双语段落明确保留反例和 missing，原九月失败段落、阈值与实现均未改。没有必要为这项记录同步重新启动实验或改运行时。
标准 premerge 的 4 direct/14 selected、双语配对差分及公开边界检查 PASS；手工核对两种语言的数字、单位、日期和否定边界一致。没有独立重跑 10k/100k、soak、恢复/consumer-lag 或 OS/runtime 矩阵，也没有查询远端 CI；这些未被记作本审通过。
我的整体评价 / Verdict
APPROVE。 这是准确保存来源和剩余义务的完整文档增量。long_horizon 为 preserved：未改变续跑、状态或资格门；user_experience 为 improved，仅指维护者在原 RFC 即可同时看到新测量与旧失败，未宣称产品运行收益。视觉检查为 not_applicable：两份 Markdown 检查点不改渲染代码或信息层级；未验证范围是文档站实际渲染及上述性能/耐久矩阵。无新增共享词汇、默认值或兼容分支，保留原章节即可；没有合并授权。
English verdict: APPROVE — 64c4798; the bilingual checkpoint matches the cited measurements and preserves failed/missing D2 evidence. This is documentation validation, not a new performance qualification.
Refs #4224.
What changes
The RFC's 2026-09-24 checkpoint (both languages) still said the 1 MiB receipt/scan budgets were failed and that #4931's merge was "read-proof optimization, not proof". Since then the formal matched-1m re-measure ran at head
a9485073f(containing the merged read-proof reuse) on a measurement entrypoint repaired by #8256 (merged 2026-11-08). This PR records the closure as a dated checkpoint inshared-goal-authority-state-provider-v0.mdandshared-goal-authority-state-provider-v0.zh-CN.md:Validation
scripts/check_rfc_bilingual.py --base origin/main --stagedpassed (both files change together).loopx checkboundary scan clean on both files;git diff --checkclean. Docs-only change; no code, tests or thresholds touched.